Evidence Strategy for Better Healthcare Decisions

Evidence that moves critical decisions forward

SRS combines evidence strategy, rigorous methodology and digital visualization to help pharma and healthcare organizations turn complex evidence into clear, actionable decision support

SRS融合证据战略、严谨方法学与数字化可视化,
帮助医药相关企业将复杂证据转化为清晰、可执行的决策支持

ILLUSTRATIVE示意界面
Evidence matrix overview — illustrative interface showing comparative evidence strength across outcomes Click to enlarge点击放大查看
Systematic Evidence Methods
Multidisciplinary Expert Team
1190+
All Projects
所有项目
20+
Years of Expertise
年专业经验
203+
Evidence-based Guidelines
基于证据的指南
50+
Cross-disciplinary Experts
跨学科专家

Which evidence questions are shaping your next decision?

From evidence planning and product value assessment to clinical practice, SRS helps teams make sense of complex evidence, clarify critical uncertainties and identify the right research and action pathways

Which evidence gaps should we prioritize with limited resources?

Evidence activities are not always connected through a unified strategy and clear overall plan

Evidence Strategy & IEGP →

Is the current evidence strong enough to clearly demonstrate the product's clinical value?

Relevant evidence is dispersed across studies and data sources, making it difficult to build a coherent view of the product's clinical value

Clinical Value Evidence & Research Solutions →

How can we generate credible comparative evidence when head-to-head studies are unavailable?

Head-to-head evidence may be unavailable, or existing studies and analyses may reach different conclusions, making relative value difficult to interpret

Clinical Value Evidence & Research Solutions →

When existing studies leave important questions unanswered, can real-world evidence help close the gap?

Important evidence gaps may remain, requiring a fit-for-purpose choice among evidence synthesis, indirect comparison, real-world research and other study approaches

Clinical Value Evidence & Research Solutions →

How can cross-functional teams align around a shared evidence strategy and priorities?

Cross-functional alignment on existing evidence, critical gaps and project priorities can be difficult to achieve

Evidence Strategy & IEGP →

How can complex evidence be translated into a credible, context-sensitive evidence body?

Relevant evidence may be dispersed across different studies and study designs, making it difficult to establish a comprehensive, credible and traceable evidence base

Guideline Evidence Support →

Solutions for critical decisions across the evidence journey

We start with the critical decision to be made, then tailor the evidence pathway to the specific context

FLAGSHIP 01

Evidence Strategy & Integrated Evidence Generation Planning

证据战略与整合性证据生成规划|IEGP

"Evidence activities are not always connected through a unified strategy and clear overall plan"

Core Value

Align decisions, evidence gaps and investment priorities into an actionable cross-functional roadmap

Typical Deliverables
  • Decision question map
  • Evidence landscape & gap map
  • Prioritization matrix
  • Evidence roadmap
Discuss Your Evidence Strategy →
FLAGSHIP 02

Clinical Value Evidence & Research Solutions

临床价值证据与研究解决方案

"Relevant evidence is dispersed across studies and data sources, making it difficult to build a coherent view of the product's clinical value"

Core Value

Integrate evidence from multiple sources and apply the right research approaches to help teams understand, compare and demonstrate a product’s clinical value

Typical Deliverables
  • Clinical value evidence framework
  • Systematic evidence synthesis report
  • NMA / MAIC / indirect comparison outputs
  • Real-world study protocol & analysis outputs
Discuss Your Evidence & Research Needs →
FLAGSHIP 03

Guideline Evidence Support

临床实践指南的证据支持

"Existing guidelines may contain numerous or differing recommendations, making it difficult to identify unresolved clinical questions and areas requiring update"

Core Value

Apply rigorous methodology to build the evidence base for context-specific recommendations, assess evidence certainty, and support transparent and interpretable recommendation development

Typical Deliverables
  • Guideline recommendation map & evidence gap map
  • Structured clinical question framework
  • Evidence profiles & SoF tables
  • Evidence certainty assessment
Talk to Our Guideline Support Team →

Evidence decisions that shaped outcomes

CASE-01: Evidence Integration Map to meta-analysis to guideline consensus update
Evidence Mapping

Igniting Evidence Value for a Mature Post-launch Product: From Evidence Mapping to Key Outcome Synthesis

Mature Post-launch Phase · Evidence Mapping & Synthesis

Clinical awareness of the existing evidence and value of the product in this indication remained limited. With constrained resources, identifying the most decision-relevant evidence questions and the right research and evidence-support pathway was challenging

Maximized the value of existing evidence within limited resources and established a connected evidence pathway from landscape assessment, gap identification and evidence synthesis through to dissemination—while informing continued real-world evidence monitoring and future research priorities

Coherent Evidence Pathway
Future Research Priorities
Maximized Existing Evidence
CASE-02: From conflicting NMAs to an updated network meta-analysis
NMA

From Conflicting NMAs to Decision-Ready Comparative Evidence

Growth Phase · Network Meta-Analysis

No direct head-to-head study existed, and multiple published network meta-analyses on the same question differed in scope, network structure, methodological quality and conclusions—so the team could not determine which estimates were reliable for decision-making

Moved the team from “multiple NMAs with unclear credibility” to a transparent understanding of why findings differed, plus systematically appraised, updated comparative estimates supporting health-economic modelling, value communication and clinical discussions

Conflict Drivers Clarified
Updated Credible Estimates
Value Communication Ready

Scientific rigor. Decision-oriented collaboration

Decision-Oriented Consulting

Bringing together the evidence, methods and expertise best suited to each decision context—every engagement starts with the decision that matters

Scientific Rigor & Quality Assurance

Grounded in systematic evidence methods, standardized processes, methodological review and expert oversight

Evidence Visualization & Digital Tools

Making complex evidence easier to explore, interpret and communicate through interactive visualization and digital tools

Multidisciplinary Expertise

Bringing together medical, evidence methodology, statistical and complementary expertise around each decision need

A Multidisciplinary Expert Model
Each engagement brings together the strategic, medical, methodological and facilitation expertise required by the decision—not a fixed, one-size-fits-all team
01
Strategic Evidence Leadership
MNC-led IEGP design and execution
Global-to-local adaptation, strategic relevance, governance and feasibility
02
Medical Affairs & Organizational Practice
Medical strategy and team leadership
Stakeholder communication and translating frameworks into day-to-day practice
03
Evidence Methodology & Study Design
Evidence mapping, gap prioritization and fit-for-purpose study design
Evidence synthesis, epidemiology, RWE and biostatistics
04
Facilitation & Capability Building
Workshop co-creation and methodology translation
Enterprise training, adult learning and capability enablement

IEGP Focus

View All Resources →
China IEGP White Paper
White Paper
Featured Topic · IEGP

China IEGP White Paper

Integrated Evidence Generation Plan (IEGP) — concepts, framework and practice pathways for transforming evidence generation in China's life sciences industry

What evidence decision is your organization facing?

Talk to an SRS expert. We usually respond within two business days